Doctor Jack's Stack Attack

Dr Jack's Stack Attack

Poker » Poker Academy » Dr Jack

  • Download
  • All about Dr Jack

    Dr Jack is one of four brothers from a large family of fifty two. A dapper gent, you will always see him in a suit. Although on the more debauched side, he claims to like a woman with a nice pair and has occasion to get blind drunk on his favoured tipple, “Gin”. He likes to run occasionally and would describe himself as straight, although most people do think he is a bit nuts. He was once caught folding to a gay waiter...

    Flush with cash and a member of several affluent clubs, he once ran a marginally successful fresh water lobster farm. Unfortunately the business flopped leaving him feeling like a bit of a cowboy. He left the world of opulence to follow his heart all the way to poker heaven. His peers describe him as a “diamond geezer” and “one of a kind”. Those who have fallen foul to his superior skills refer to him with less gracious terms.

    Dr Jack lives in a rather full house in the Cotswold’s with his two dogs Siegfried and Roy and a Bolivian tree frog called Boris.

Poker getting you down? Feel the need for some lovin and advice?

Our resident poker pro is half Dr Phil, half Dr Ruth and all Dr Poker-Love. Dr Jack your poker agony aunt is on hand 24/7 to listen to your poker woes, help you find your inner pro and point you in the general direction of easy money.

Doctor Jack is committed to answering all of your emails. In addition to this Dr Jack selects from the great big poker mail-sack and prints them on our web site so that others may gain some insight into his mad poker brain. Not only that but every week you could be selected for our “Stack Attack” feature. Writer of “Stack Attack” letter of the week will receive a $20 Bonus!

Home | Archive | Ask Doctor Jack!

Hi Doc,

I’m having problems in knowing how to play certain hands under the gun, pocket nines through to pocket aces.  Generally I would raise with 99, TT and JJ UTG [1st position to act], as this lets me know where I stand if I’m re raised.  I’m a little unsure about QQ and limp with AA and KK in the hope I can re raise, but I’ve heard it is bad policy to limp with any cards UTG?  Is this true?

AbigdealA



Hello AbigdealA!  

How are you?  The weather has been beastly for the past month, so I haven’t had much of a summer I’m afraid (though Jacqueline has enjoyed having me about the house, it must be stated) – luckily, the rain and winds have let me enjoy more online poker than is usual during June and July, so I hope I am better placed to answer your question than before!

Playing from the Under The Gun (UTG) position can be quite tricky.  You are 1st to act after all the cards have been dealt and on a full table this means that there will be 8 other players to act after you.  As a result, I think you need a very clear plan of how to react in all circumstances that may occur after you decide to stay in the hand by either calling the big blind (limping) or raising.

What will you do if three other players flat call and the player on the button (last to act before the two players who posted blinds) makes a big raise?  What if the next player to act after you raises your flat call or re-raises your raise?  What will you do if three players see a flop and the big blind raises into you?  Unless all the other players in the hand, apart from the blinds, fold, playing UTG means that there will be players to act after you on the flop and perhaps on subsequent streets (the turn and the river), and so your position will be acting against you!

For all these reasons, it is worth thinking hard about your plan for the hand if you decide to play on.  I think there is an argument for limping UTG with 99, TT and JJ if you are on an aggressive table where your initial raise is likely to be re-raised by a player closer to the button.  Re-raising again (or ‘4-betting’) UTG with these medium pairs can get you into a world of trouble (what if the other player then goes all in and you are unsure about your hand?); but you limp with these hands, you can then can the inevitable raise in the hope of hitting your set on the flop.  Set mining on aggressive tables can be very profitable, believe me!

At the same time, if the table is ultra aggressive and you think your raise UTG is more than likely to be re-raised by a player with a very wide range, I wouldn’t be unhappy to pump up the pot pre-flop and re-assess when those three cards have been dealt.  Against a serial re-raiser, I would be happy to ‘go to war’ with 99-JJ pre-flop, even to the point of getting all my chips into the pot at this stage, if I believed his 4-betting range was wide enough!

Likewise, on a very aggressive table I would always raise UTG with QQ, KK or AA in the hope of being re-raised.  If this happens you can then vary it up by 4-betting 80% of the time and flat calling your opponents re-raise (assuming no-one else is now in the hand, if so you should raise)  the other 20%.  It is great to have big hands against these aggressive opponents; it is so much easier getting their chips into the pot if they keep on betting at you or happily call your big raises!

On a passive table, I typically raise UTG with 99+, but am willing to throw away 99, TT, JJ and even QQ if there is a huge amount of action by the other players (raise, re-raise, 4-bet, 5-bet, etc!).  I would be less likely to limp with KK or AA as there is less likelihood that you will be raised and with your premium hands, you want to build the pot as much as you can while you are ahead, in order to extract maximum value.  There is nothing worse than limping with AA, seeing an Ace-high flop and only taking down the blinds when you bet at it!

There was one circumstance many years ago where I was seated UTG with 88 on a very passive table, limped in along with 4 or 5 other players and hit the dream flop of 88x!  I decided to be sneaky and checked when action got to me, and it was checked around.  On the K turn I couldn’t wait any longer and bet half the small pot, praying that one of my opponents had a strong king and would re-raise.  I got one flat caller, who folded when I again bet half the pot on the river.  I hardly won anything, as I hadn’t built the pot either pre-flop or on the flop.  That soon ended my limping UTG with a medium-strength hand on a passive table!

I’ll end by re-iterating how important it is to have a clear plan in your head if you decide to get involved when sitting UTG.  Your position at the table is poor, so factor this into your decision and don’t leave yourself having to fold on the flop or later streets having played passively and still putting too much of your stack into the pot.  My Jacqueline constantly berates me for my misuse of position and for not having a plan for what I am doing – yes, the advice given above covers more aspects of life other than just poker, let me assure you!

Best of luck at the tables,

Dr. Jack

This week's other letters

Hi Jack,

Why does it appear that more bad beats occur online than in a live game? Is it because players are much looser?

Yours in puzzlement,

OziFigjam





Hello Ozi!

This is a question that has been asked by online players since the wonderful game of poker moved onto the vast network of cables, nodes and who-knows-what-else that we call the internet!

Lots of different things seem different on the internet compared to how they are in ‘real life’ – hotel rooms look much better on a computer screen than when you actually arrive (which is why we rarely travel anymore!) and the less said about buying traditional Dutch wooden clogs online the better. As for the disappointment of meeting someone in real life that you first became acquainted with online; well, photographs can be doctored! I shouldn’t go into that episode actually; Jacqueline still hasn’t forgiven me and checks my internet history every time I use the computer!

With regard to the apparent avalanche of bad beats experienced online compared to playing live; the key word in that sentence is ‘apparent’. The reason we experience more bad beats online is down to the fact we play so many more hands online than we would do in the same amount of time live. In a live poker environment, a player would expect to be dealt between 20 and 30 hands per hour; while playing online, you can expect to be dealt between 50 and 70 hands per hours on average. Therefore, you should expect to see more than twice as many bad beats!

Playing multiple tables online, while multiplying the amount of money you can win, also will multiply the number of bad beats you will see on average. This is self-evident really; if you have six poker tables open on your laptop, you may be dealt over 400 hands in total during a single hour – seeing an equivalent number of hands live might take you sixteen hours! If you’ve ever playing such a long session live (and I’d say some of us have!), you’ll see all manner of bad beats, aces cracked by 72 off, dominated players hitting runner-runner straights and flushes and other such abominations of poker.

So the appearance of many more bad beats in online poker compared to live is somewhat illusionary. However, there is another reason why you may be more likely to see a bad beat online than live, and that is due to the very nature of online poker.

In many live poker settings, most of the players know one another and this affects their play whether they realise it or not. Players are more wary of making a mistake, getting their chips into the pot while drawing to few outs and having bad play colour their opponents’ views of them. So often players will tighten up when playing live, don’t get involved in so many marginal situations and as a result, less bad beats occur. Fear of looking like a donkey overrides their desire to get their chips into the pot and let Lady Luck decide!

Online, players can be playing in an empty house, wearing little more than a pair of velvet slippers and a smile (again, speaking from experience) and are often in a different country to their opponents, so the fear of looking like a donkey is not as prevalent – who cares if they call an all-in bet on the turn with only two outs to win, no-one at the table knows their real name or what they look like, do they?

In any case, the appearance of more bad beats online compared to live is not due to online poker being rigged or other such conspiracy stories; it is mainly down to the huge number of hands being dealt online compared to live and perhaps the looser play that can be evident at certain stakes and from certain players online.

I hope that this clears it up for you Ozi! Maybe you can turn the tables and be the one delivering the bad beats, instead of receiving them, over the next few months. Speaking of bad beats, I hear my Lady Jacqueline calling me to the basement again…I do hope she isn’t planning on breaking out the leather strap and wooden paddles again!

See you on the tables,

Dr. Jack

To the Good Doctor,

In a reply to a query on online tells, you mentioned looking for players that fold via check boxes…so how can you tell if they are?  

Keep up the good work!

kerrybob





Hello Bob!  

Aha, dragging something up from my long-forgotten past I see!  My Mistress Jacqueline uses that trick all the time to shame me into doing whatever she wants – ‘remember the time you and your college roommate got drunk and went skinny-dipping together – now take me shopping’ or ‘remember the time you drank a whole bottle of fine whiskey; we never saw Weeny my Chihuahua after that night, suspicious – now buy me a chocolate cake’ and so on.  That being said, I vaguely recall writing about online tells, so it looks like you might be in luck young man!

It is quite easy to notice when players are using the ‘fold’ check box option, as their cards will be folded immediately as action gets to them.  Occasionally this will seem to happen due to internet connection issues, but if you notice players continually folding (or checking on the big blind) almost instantaneously as action gets to them, you can be sure they are using the ‘fold’ button (or ‘check / fold’ button on the big blind).  

These convenience buttons (which also include ‘call’, ‘call any’ and ‘bet any’ buttons) are widely used by players at lower stakes cash tables and tournaments to give the game a better flow, but much rarely by higher stakes players.  This is because the use of the convenience buttons can sometimes give off some information to your opponents.  

For example, frequent use of the ‘fold’ or ‘check / fold’ buttons will obviously show that you have no interest in those hands (automatic checking of your big blind will just encourage your opponents to bet into you after the flop) and that you probably aren’t paying much attention to the hand once you’ve thrown your cards away.  It would also indicate that you are playing a very formulaic style of poker, with fixed ranges of starting hands – if you are using the ‘fold’ button too liberally on the button or the cut-off (the position one to the right of the button), you are probably throwing away money!  Most of the time, when action is folded to me in either of these positions, I will raise (dependant on the opponents in the blinds) with any two cards – seven-deuce can be enough to steal those blinds!

Meanwhile, using the ‘call’ or ‘call any’ buttons (again, obvious to most others at the table by your instantaneous calling of their bet once action gets to you) indicates weakness and drawing hands.  If you were really trying to maximise value with a monster hand, surely you would wait until the action was on you to make your decision?  Insta-calling is a common move by multi-tablers anxious to get to see another card – if you notice your opponent trying this on the flop, remember this when action gets to you on the turn or river!

Well, I hope that helps a little Bob!  Now, if you please, do not bring up any of my old writings again, for fear of what other memories it may resurrect in my mind – I have done many things I would like to forget, both as an eager young college student and in these last few years with Jacqueline…I’ve almost forgotten her skill with a wooden paddle…just a few more bottles of whiskey and I’ll have forgotten entirely!

Good luck at the tables,

Dr. Jack

Top of page